Stars, before they were stars


Tom Sellek sah 1970 genauso aus wie heute, Hugh Grant 1986 war sogar noch schleimiger, Wesley Snipes hat Michael Jackson den Arsch aufgerissen und über John Travolta brauchen wir gar nicht erst anfangen!!

In : Filmfun

About the author

Bei den Filmfreunden bloggt Malcolm über die wunderbare Welt der seichten Unterhaltung. Auf eye said it before bloggt der freundlichste Filmfreund (Nilz N Burger) über Flausch, Werbung und WTF. Wenn er gerade nicht bloggt, arbeitet Malcolm freiberuflich als Digital Creative, wo er das Internet zu einem schöneren Ort macht. Nichts zu danken.


  1. Injecter

    Jude hat ja mal gerult ^^

    Agassi! HAHHAHA

    Der Jean-Clochard auch nich schlecht ^^

    Die Halliwell sieht ja fast aus wie die Johansson in dem Clip o.O

    Snipes hat schon immer gerult …

    Travolta musste Germfree für FaceOff werdn, is doch klar.

    Achjaaa… Diese Genussbilder (Reeves)… sehen immer gleich lollig/bescheuert aus

    Die Foster… Das is ja mal ne Stimme O.o

    CHAAAAAAAZZZ its a great feeling…

    SpearS?! war krasser – schade dass ihr bester (1.) Auftritt von YouTube weg is -.- Obwohl die Spears ja auch nich gerade besser gewordn sein zu scheint…

    Robbie sieht aber auch gleich aus – arrangement mit selleck ?

    Hätte der Martin seine Haare mal behaltn *lool*

    Clooney? WTF??? omg

    Posh *bäh* … Deren Beine sind gleich geblieben!

    Travolta: ICH KORRIGIERE: Dafür! musste er germfree werdn.

    Danke Filmfreunde … danke!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

Fünf Facefreunde
Fünf Filmtumblr
  • photo from Tumblr


    That lightsaber sound lol

    Get the My Neighbor Groot shirt


  • photo from Tumblr


    Putting The Cost Of The ESA’s Rosetta Mission In Perspective

    "So what do we get for our €1.4bn? Rosetta is both an astounding feat of engineering (catapulting a tonne of spacecraft across millions of kilometres of space and ending up in orbit around a comet just 4 km across) and an extraordinary opportunity for science (allowing us to examine the surface of a lump of rock and ice which dates from when the Solar System formed).

    Like a lot of blue-skies science, it’s very hard to put a value on the mission. First, there are the immediate spin-offs like engineering know-how; then, the knowledge accrued, which could inform our understanding of our cosmic origins, amongst other things; and finally, the inspirational value of this audacious feat in which we can all share, including the next generation of scientists.

    Whilst those things are hard to price precisely, in common with other blue-skies scientific projects, Rosetta is cheap. At €1.4bn, developing, building, launching and learning from the mission will cost about the same as 4.2 Airbus A380s—pretty impressive when you consider that it’s an entirely bespoke robotic spacecraft, not a production airliner. On a more everyday scale, it’s cost European citizens somewhere around twenty Euro cents per person per year since the project began in 1996.

    Rosetta has already sent us some stunning images of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and today’s landing will, with any luck, provide us with our first close-up glimpse of the chaotic surface of this dirty snowball. If you’re a sci-fi fan, then, you might consider the mission to have been worth its price tag just for the pictures. The total cost for the Rosetta mission is about €3.50 per person in Europe; based on the average cinema ticket price in the UK (€8.50), it has cost less than half of what it will cost for you to go to see Interstellar.”

    Via Scienceogram:

    Find Out How Budget Cuts Canceled NASA’s Own Comet Landing Mission:


  • photo from Tumblr


    i never wanted this to end


  • photo from Tumblr


    Life is too short to be holding on to old grudges


  • photo from Tumblr