Happy Gilmore Science


(Youtube Direktgilmore, via Kottke)

Sport Science auf FSN (wer oder was auch immer ein FSN ist) untersucht, ob der Happy Gilmore Golfschwung tatsächlich besser ist, als der herkömmliche. Und da Happy Gilmore der beste Film Sandlers ist, um nicht zu sagen: der einzig ansehbare und weil sich Wissenschaft und Film sowieso hervorragend vertragen, ist das ganze auch sehr, sehr unterhaltsam geworden.

In : Filmfun

About the author

Related Articles


  1. Björn

    Geil :D

  2. Kommissario

    FSN = Fox Sports Network, oder so.

  3. Patrick B. Rau

    Padraig? Was für ein komischer Name.

  4. Andi

    ich liebe solche populärwissenschaftlichen Beiträge und Sendungen (wie z.B. Brainiac).

  5. jAnsen

    Punch-Drunk Love, Reign Over Me und Click waren sehr anständige, durchaus empfehlenswerte filme mit sandler, den ich persönlich auch nicht gerade mag.
    diese undifferenzierten rants, die in den immer populistischer werdenden posts der letzten zeit um sich greifen, finden nur zwölfjährige “so richtig geil”.
    bitte bietet wieder mehr inhalte.

  6. Happ Gilmore Swing geht das wirklich?

    […] Happy Gilmore Science | Die Fünf Filmfreunde Tags: Adam Sandler, Golf, Happy Gilmore, Science, Video Dies & Das RSS-Feed Trackback […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

Fünf Facefreunde
Fünf Filmtumblr
  • photo from Tumblr



    Whoever created this: thank you!!

    Haha! Well done!


  • photo from Tumblr


    That lightsaber sound lol

    Get the My Neighbor Groot shirt http://buff.ly/1EFUcA2 http://ift.tt/1BEBgm8


  • photo from Tumblr


    Putting The Cost Of The ESA’s Rosetta Mission In Perspective

    "So what do we get for our €1.4bn? Rosetta is both an astounding feat of engineering (catapulting a tonne of spacecraft across millions of kilometres of space and ending up in orbit around a comet just 4 km across) and an extraordinary opportunity for science (allowing us to examine the surface of a lump of rock and ice which dates from when the Solar System formed).

    Like a lot of blue-skies science, it’s very hard to put a value on the mission. First, there are the immediate spin-offs like engineering know-how; then, the knowledge accrued, which could inform our understanding of our cosmic origins, amongst other things; and finally, the inspirational value of this audacious feat in which we can all share, including the next generation of scientists.

    Whilst those things are hard to price precisely, in common with other blue-skies scientific projects, Rosetta is cheap. At €1.4bn, developing, building, launching and learning from the mission will cost about the same as 4.2 Airbus A380s—pretty impressive when you consider that it’s an entirely bespoke robotic spacecraft, not a production airliner. On a more everyday scale, it’s cost European citizens somewhere around twenty Euro cents per person per year since the project began in 1996.

    Rosetta has already sent us some stunning images of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and today’s landing will, with any luck, provide us with our first close-up glimpse of the chaotic surface of this dirty snowball. If you’re a sci-fi fan, then, you might consider the mission to have been worth its price tag just for the pictures. The total cost for the Rosetta mission is about €3.50 per person in Europe; based on the average cinema ticket price in the UK (€8.50), it has cost less than half of what it will cost for you to go to see Interstellar.”

    Via Scienceogram: http://scienceogram.org/blog/2014/11/rosetta-comet-esa-lander-cost/

    Find Out How Budget Cuts Canceled NASA’s Own Comet Landing Mission: http://www.penny4nasa.org/2014/11/11/how-budget-cuts-canceled-nasa-own-rosetta-comet-landing-mission/


  • photo from Tumblr


    i never wanted this to end


  • photo from Tumblr


    Life is too short to be holding on to old grudges