Some smaller children may find Sarah Jessica Parkers face disturbing and emotionally scarring.


Ein Hoch auf User Generated Contend! Im Parental Guide zum Sex and the City-Film findet sich am Ende unter Frightening/Intense Scenes folgender Eintrag: „Some smaller children may find Sarah Jessica Parkers face disturbing and emotionally scarring.“ Oh, teh LULZ!

(via Reddit)

In : Filmfun

About the author

Related Articles


  1. Moe

    das haben doch die SouthPark macher reingemoggelt. in der letzten folge hats da nämlich Sarah Jessica Parker gut abbekommen.

  2. Kiran

    hahahahaha…warum so nen langes Gesicht!? :D

  3. Praelat

    Und es ist auch schon wieder weg (“Page last updated by IMDbCS, 10 minutes ago”).

  4. TopF

    wenn das nicht mal eine nachricht ist.. XDDD

  5. Irreversibel

    Existiert dieser ominöse und verklemmte Parental Guide etwas für jeden Film bei imdb?? Ist mir bisher noch nie aufgefallen…..

  6. jansenfab

    “Matthew Broderick, why is there a transvestite donkey witch dressed like a woman standing next to you?”

  7. lowjoker

    Haha, das ist ja echt lulz^^ Ich dachte im ersten Moment, dass die News was mit South Park zu tun hätte. Da wird Sarah Jessica Parker bezüglich ihres Aussehens auch nicht gerade positiv in Szene gesetzt. Sollte man sich unbedingt anschauen, auf –> S14E02 “The Tale of Scrotie McBoogerballs”

  8. keiler "beule" stopfer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

Fünf Facefreunde
Fünf Filmtumblr
  • photo from Tumblr


    That lightsaber sound lol

    Get the My Neighbor Groot shirt


  • photo from Tumblr


    Putting The Cost Of The ESA’s Rosetta Mission In Perspective

    "So what do we get for our €1.4bn? Rosetta is both an astounding feat of engineering (catapulting a tonne of spacecraft across millions of kilometres of space and ending up in orbit around a comet just 4 km across) and an extraordinary opportunity for science (allowing us to examine the surface of a lump of rock and ice which dates from when the Solar System formed).

    Like a lot of blue-skies science, it’s very hard to put a value on the mission. First, there are the immediate spin-offs like engineering know-how; then, the knowledge accrued, which could inform our understanding of our cosmic origins, amongst other things; and finally, the inspirational value of this audacious feat in which we can all share, including the next generation of scientists.

    Whilst those things are hard to price precisely, in common with other blue-skies scientific projects, Rosetta is cheap. At €1.4bn, developing, building, launching and learning from the mission will cost about the same as 4.2 Airbus A380s—pretty impressive when you consider that it’s an entirely bespoke robotic spacecraft, not a production airliner. On a more everyday scale, it’s cost European citizens somewhere around twenty Euro cents per person per year since the project began in 1996.

    Rosetta has already sent us some stunning images of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and today’s landing will, with any luck, provide us with our first close-up glimpse of the chaotic surface of this dirty snowball. If you’re a sci-fi fan, then, you might consider the mission to have been worth its price tag just for the pictures. The total cost for the Rosetta mission is about €3.50 per person in Europe; based on the average cinema ticket price in the UK (€8.50), it has cost less than half of what it will cost for you to go to see Interstellar.”

    Via Scienceogram:

    Find Out How Budget Cuts Canceled NASA’s Own Comet Landing Mission:


  • photo from Tumblr


    i never wanted this to end


  • photo from Tumblr


    Life is too short to be holding on to old grudges


  • photo from Tumblr