Review: After Earth


Historische Tiefstwertung bei den ShortCuts. Eine größere Grütze habe ich bisher dort nicht bewertet:


In : Review

About the author

Related Articles


  1. Mandrenke

    Haha, großartig. Danke! :)

  2. Sebastian

    Kann es sein, das sein Sohn der neue Til Schweiger wird? ;)

  3. Popcorninseinemhaar

    Böser Shyamalan! Dafür gibts 2 Sterne abzug nachträglich für “Lady in the Water” (null Sterne für AE wären einfach immernoch zu viel) Gerne sehe ich mir dummes Popcornkino an, aber selbst das ist der Film nicht.

  4. Ronscha

    Der Begriff Gehirnsodbrennen hat mir gefallen…

  5. burns

    Zu geil, Nilz: Sogar ein Frontalverriss wirkt bei Dir noch megasympathisch.
    Musste am Schluss sehr viel (mit-)lachen. :-)

  6. Dingens

    Nils, das war mehr Filmanalyse als was dieser Horst auf MP zu Stande bekommt. Warum machst du das nicht!?

  7. Tschango

    Ich schreibe nie Kommentare, aber was muss das muss:
    Ich verneige mich in tiefer Erfurcht vor dem Mann, der mich seit langem mal wieder über ein Internetvideo lachen ließ. Danke Nils…

  8. Die Review als Textgattung | Bloggen als Praxis

    […] Filmfreunde. Diese bewerten Filme hinsichtlich subjektiver Kriterien, wie man sehr gut in dieser Kritik über “After Earth”  nachvollziehen kann. Der Emmitent bewertet den Film mit Worten wie “große Grütze” […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

Fünf Facefreunde
Fünf Filmtumblr
  • photo from Tumblr


    That lightsaber sound lol

    Get the My Neighbor Groot shirt


  • photo from Tumblr


    Putting The Cost Of The ESA’s Rosetta Mission In Perspective

    "So what do we get for our €1.4bn? Rosetta is both an astounding feat of engineering (catapulting a tonne of spacecraft across millions of kilometres of space and ending up in orbit around a comet just 4 km across) and an extraordinary opportunity for science (allowing us to examine the surface of a lump of rock and ice which dates from when the Solar System formed).

    Like a lot of blue-skies science, it’s very hard to put a value on the mission. First, there are the immediate spin-offs like engineering know-how; then, the knowledge accrued, which could inform our understanding of our cosmic origins, amongst other things; and finally, the inspirational value of this audacious feat in which we can all share, including the next generation of scientists.

    Whilst those things are hard to price precisely, in common with other blue-skies scientific projects, Rosetta is cheap. At €1.4bn, developing, building, launching and learning from the mission will cost about the same as 4.2 Airbus A380s—pretty impressive when you consider that it’s an entirely bespoke robotic spacecraft, not a production airliner. On a more everyday scale, it’s cost European citizens somewhere around twenty Euro cents per person per year since the project began in 1996.

    Rosetta has already sent us some stunning images of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and today’s landing will, with any luck, provide us with our first close-up glimpse of the chaotic surface of this dirty snowball. If you’re a sci-fi fan, then, you might consider the mission to have been worth its price tag just for the pictures. The total cost for the Rosetta mission is about €3.50 per person in Europe; based on the average cinema ticket price in the UK (€8.50), it has cost less than half of what it will cost for you to go to see Interstellar.”

    Via Scienceogram:

    Find Out How Budget Cuts Canceled NASA’s Own Comet Landing Mission:


  • photo from Tumblr


    i never wanted this to end


  • photo from Tumblr


    Life is too short to be holding on to old grudges


  • photo from Tumblr